Compliance and Risk Review
Comprehensive review of compliance, risk and operational processes for every SEBI-regulated stock broker and depository participant.
.svg){kind=icon}
Overview
Periodic compliance and process reviews give management confidence in regulatory alignment across all operational functions.
.svg)
Stock Brokers and Depository Participants are required to implement robust processes aligned with regulatory and compliance requirements prescribed by SEBI, stock exchanges and Depositories.
These processes span across the entire operational lifecycle, from client onboarding to daily and periodical reporting to clients and regulators. It also necessitates embedding inherent internal controls to ensure integrity.
It is imperative to conduct periodical reviews of compliance and risk management processes to ensure that the business and operations are aligned with the regulatory requirements and give the management a confidence in their processes.
Scope of Review
Four critical operational areas reviewed across client onboarding, risk management, EOD operations and regulatory reporting.
Client Onboarding Review
Online account opening, KYC documentation and system approvals reviewed.
Online account opening processes reviewed. KYC and documentation validation checked. System-level checks and approvals verified for accuracy and completeness. Onboarding process aligned with SEBI and exchange requirements throughout.
Risk Management Controls
Fund allocation, margin management and intraday controls at RMS level.
Allocation of funds and securities at RMS level reviewed. Margin allocation to clients verified. Handling of intraday fund receipts checked. Pledge and unpledge processing and allocation during the day reviewed.
.svg)
End-of-Day Operations
Billing, reconciliation, contract notes and client communication reviewed.
Billing and brokerage computation processes reviewed. Reconciliation of funds and securities verified. Generation and dispatch of contract notes and daily margin statements checked. Client communications and disclosures reviewed for accuracy.
Regulatory Reporting Review
Margin, MTF, collateral and client holding submission processes reviewed.
Margin reporting processes reviewed. Margin Trading Facility (MTF) reporting checked. Allocation, segregation and collateral reporting reviewed. Client holding submissions and upstreaming of funds to clearing corporations verified.
Problems We Identify
Entities frequently encounter these issues due to process gaps, inadequate controls or lack of independent validation.
.svg)
Incorrect Data Submissions
Incorrect or inconsistent data submissions identified across multiple regulatory reports. Shortfall in margin collection or reporting found. Delays in regulatory reporting to exchanges and SEBI identified and addressed.
Exchange Observations Received
Observations raised by exchanges through Letters of Observation identified and addressed. Non-compliance identified during internal audits reviewed. Regulatory inspection findings mapped to process gaps and corrective actions recommended.
Process and Control Gaps
Process gaps and inadequate internal controls identified across operational workflows. Lack of independent validation identified as akey root cause. Control weaknesses across client onboarding, margin management and reporting addressed systematically.
Reporting Delay Violations
Delays in submission of regulatory reports to exchanges and SEBI identified and root-caused. Short fall in required format validation addressed. Strict regulatory timelines and accuracy requirements met through structured process improvements.
Audit and Inspection Remarks
Non-compliance findings identified during internal audits and regulatory inspections addressed through structured process review. Independent validation gaps remediated. Governance and control frameworks strengthened to reduce recurrence of audit and inspection observations.
Benefits
Structured compliance and process review delivers accuracy, control strength and complete inspection preparedness for regulated entities.
Improved Reporting Accuracy
Regulatory reporting accuracy improved across all submission types.
Improved accuracy in regulatory reporting across all exchange and SEBI submissions. Reduced risk of observations, penalties and audit remarks through strengthened process controls and independent validation before every submission.
Strengthened Internal Controls
Internal controls and governance framework strengthened across operations.
Strengthened internal controls and governance framework across all operational areas. Enhanced operational efficiency and standardisation throughout compliance and reporting workflows. Management confidence in regulatory alignment increased significantly.
Better Audit Preparedness
Operations better prepared for regulatory audits and exchange inspections.
Enhanced preparedness for internal audits, regulatory inspections and exchange reviews. Gaps identified and remediated before inspection teams arrive. Inspection observations and adverse audit findings significantly reduced through proactive review.
Reduced Penalty Risk
Risk of exchange observations, penalties and adverse remarks reduced.
Reduced risk of exchange observations, regulatory penalties and adverse audit remarks. Proactive identification of compliance gaps before they attract regulatory attention. Standardised processes aligned with regulatory requirements across all operational functions.
Why SecMark
Three-stage review methodology covering process evaluation, gap identification and post-implementation validation for every engagement.
Detailed Process Review
Detailed evaluation of each operational process conducted. Control gaps and compliance risks identified across all functions. Processes mapped against SEBI, exchange and depository regulatory requirements for every operational area reviewed.
Gap Report Recommendations
Detailed review report prepared with all identified gaps documented. Practical and implementable recommendations provided. Process improvement and control enhancement measures recommended with specific action steps and timelines for implementation.
Implementation Validation Support
Post-implementation review of corrective actions conducted. Verification of control effectiveness across all remediated areas. Alignment with regulatory expectations confirmed through independent validation after every corrective action implementation cycle.
Disclaimer: SecMark provides assistance in inspection preparedness, data validation and response drafting. However, SecMark does not guarantee the outcomes of inspection process. All regulatory decisions remain at the discretion of the respective authorities and any consequences arising therefrom shall be borne by the client without recourse to SecMark.
